AI

Building AI Features That Actually Ship

Demos impress. Production AI features need evals, fallbacks, cost caps, and a clear job to do. Here’s the path we use to close that gap.

SH

Sarim Ul Haq

Principal AI Engineer

11 min read

Key takeaways

  • Define the job and success metric before writing prompts
  • Build a small eval set from real user scenarios first
  • Ship with fallbacks, cost caps, and human handoff from day one

Most AI features die between the demo and the first real users. The prompt looks clever in a slide deck. Then latency spikes, costs climb, edge cases pile up, and the team quietly turns the feature off.

If you can’t measure quality, you don’t have an AI product - you have a demo.

Start with the job, not the model

Before you pick a model, write one sentence: what decision or task does this feature take off a human’s plate? If the answer is vague (“make the product smarter”), stop. Narrow it to a job with a measurable outcome - draft a reply, extract fields, rank options, summarize a ticket.

  • One primary user job, stated in plain language
  • A success metric you can score (accuracy, time saved, resolution rate)
  • A clear non-goal (what the model must not invent or decide alone)
  • An owner for quality after launch - not “the AI person when free”

Eval before prompts

We build a tiny evaluation set before we polish prompts. Twenty to fifty real-ish scenarios is enough to start. Include the messy ones: empty input, hostile users, multilingual text, PII, and the cases where “I don’t know” is the right answer.

  1. 01

    Collect scenarios

    Pull from support tickets, sales calls, or product analytics - not invented happy paths.

  2. 02

    Label expected behavior

    For each scenario, define a good answer shape, a refuse condition, or a handoff trigger.

  3. 03

    Score every change

    Prompt, model, or retrieval change only ships if the eval set holds or improves.

Production is a system, not a prompt

Graceful degradation is non-negotiable. If the model is slow, wrong, or unavailable, users should still finish the job - with a cached answer, a simpler rule path, or a human handoff.

<2s

Target p95 latency for interactive AI UX

Cost spike without per-request caps

1

Fallback path required before launch

Demo mindset
Ship mindset
Best-case prompt on clean input
Eval set with ugly real inputs
Single model call
Timeouts, retries, and degrade paths
Open-ended creativity
Constrained outputs + validation
“We’ll monitor later”
Traces, cost alerts, quality dashboards

Cost and safety gates

  • Hard caps per request and per user/day - not “we’ll watch the bill”
  • Output validation before anything hits the UI or writes to a database
  • PII redaction on inputs that leave your boundary
  • Kill switch: disable the AI path without redeploying the whole app

What “done” looks like

An AI feature is ready when a new engineer can read the eval set, the fallback map, and the cost limits - and know how to improve quality without guessing. Prompts alone are not the product. The product is the system around them.

Related services

MintyLogix

Want this applied to your product?

Tell us what you're building. We'll respond with a clear plan - no pitch theater.

Start a project